SOIL
CARBON AND CLIMATE CHANGE NEWS
From
Consortium for Agricultural Soils
Mitigation of Greenhouse Gases (CASMGS)
http://soilcarboncenter.k-state.edu
Charles W. Rice, K-State Department of
Agronomy, National CASMGS Director
(785) 532-7217 cwrice@ksu.edu
Scott Staggenborg, K-State Department of
Agronomy (785) 532-7214 sstaggen@ksu.edu
Steve Watson, CASMGS Communications (785)
532-7105 swatson@ksu.edu
April 24, 2009
No. 66
Effect of single
tillage operation
on carbon
sequestration in a no-till system
No-till
crop production systems have been found to increase soil carbon sequestration
in most situations. But sometimes circumstances arise in which a one-time
tillage operation becomes necessary in an otherwise continuous no-till system. What
effect will such a single low-intensity tillage operation have on stored soil
carbon? Would a single low-intensity tillage operation reverse years of carbon
accumulation in no-till?
To
answer this question, Chuck Rice, professor of agronomy at
*
Disk plow
*
Chisel plow
*
Sweep plow
One plot
was kept in no-till production. In the tillage plots, the land was returned to
no-till after the one-time tillage operation was performed. The soil was
sampled at three depths (0-5 cm, 5-15 cm, and 15-30 cm) for total carbon, aggregate
distribution, and bulk density pre-tillage, then at 9 and 12 months after the
tillage treatment.
Key
Findings
* A single tillage pass with
a disk, sweep, or chisel did not affect soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks
compared to uninterrupted no-till under dryland cropping in a semi-arid
environment. At the
Whole soil C mass by
tillage and depth, 12 months after treatment
Wallace Co.,
|
|
Mg C per hectare |
|
One-time tillage treatment |
0-5 cm |
5-15 cm |
15-30 cm |
None (cont. no-till) |
14.6 |
30.8 |
31.8 |
Disk Plow |
18.3 |
28.4 |
33.7 |
Sweep Plow |
16.3 |
30.1 |
31.5 |
Chisel Plow |
15.6 |
26.4 |
30.6 |
|
|
Mg C per hectare |
|
One-time tillage treatment |
0-5 cm |
5-15 cm |
15-30 cm |
None (cont. no-till) |
12.0 |
19.6 |
29.5 |
Disk Plow |
10.6 |
21.1 |
32.4 |
Sweep Plow |
10.8 |
18.3 |
33.2 |
Chisel Plow |
11.6 |
20.8 |
32.2 |
Tribune,
|
|
Mg C per hectare |
|
One-time tillage treatment |
0-5 cm |
5-15 cm |
15-30 cm |
None (cont. no-till) |
9.0 |
15.8 |
16.3 |
Disk Plow |
10.8 |
15.7 |
16.2 |
Sweep Plow |
10.2 |
15.0 |
18.8 |
Chisel Plow |
9.9 |
13.4 |
14.7 |
* Aggregation was not
significantly affected by a single tillage operation. There were some changes
in aggregation due to cropping sequence and changes in soil moisture, but not
due to the single tillage operation. At all three sites there was a general
trend for the amount of large microaggregates to decrease and small
microaggregates to increase over time.
* The greatest mass
of aggregate-associated C existed in the large microaggregate fraction for all
three soils. It is this aggregate size fraction that had the greatest influence
on whole soil C for these locations. However, other pools of organic C
contributed to the net accumulation or loss of whole soil organic C besides
aggregate-protected C.
* Tillage did not
significantly affect bulk density at any location.
Other Similar Studies
The results of this study
are similar to those of several studies involving more intensive one-time
tillage operations, such as:
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Some other studies on this
topic have had slightly different findings for soil the effects of a one-time
tillage on soil aggregation, however. In a
Summary
In
the arid environment of western
-- Steve Watson, CASMGS
Communications