|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Phase I assessment of terrestrial potential
- Modeled using CENTURY, GIS
- Agriculture is currently a net C sink
- MT has greatest land base but
- SD has most cropland
- No-till in SD offers most
- potential
|
|
3
|
- National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) monthly average precip, min/max
temperature since 1895 by station and climate division.
|
|
4
|
- SSURGO/STATSGO map unit data extracted into sand/silt/clay % grids. Bulk
density from texture
- ENVI processing to generate soil classes
- Distributed soil classes within counties
|
|
5
|
- Historical data from extension survey (SD), NASS crop databases, Census
of Agriculture, anecdotal sources (types of crops, fertilizer use,
irrigation)
- Conservation tillage and CRP data
for 2002 from CTIC. No-till = ZERO tillage
- For point simulations, represent spatial proportions of crops as
temporal series
- 6 timeblocks: 1900-35, 1936-45, 1946-65, 1966-82, 1983-89, 1990-
- Assume grassland for baseline period
|
|
6
|
- Assume no fertilizer before 1965
- Assume no irrigation unless >50% of crop was irrigated
- Scenarios
- ct2ct: continuous conventional tillage since 1900
- ct2nt: conventional, change to no-till in 1990
- ct2crp: conventional, change to CRP in 1990
- grz2grz: continuous grazing since 1990
- grz2crp: removal of grazing in 1990
|
|
7
|
- No public lands in simulation
- Runs to 2030 (stochastic weather after 2003)
- For each state:
- 8-10 climate divisions
- 17-19 soil classes
- 5 scenarios
- = up to 900 separate simulations
- Distribute results over county/soil class cells, sum for county-level
output
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|