1
|
- Mark Sperow
- Christopher Bouquot
- West Virginia University
- Morgantown, WV
- 23 March 2005
- Presentation at the 2005 USDA Symposium on Greenhouse Gases and Carbon
Sequestration in Agriculture and Forestry
- 21 – 24 March 2005, Baltimore, MD
|
2
|
- Since 1977, mine operators required to reclaim disturbed land by
planting grass, pasture, or trees (Surface Mining Control and Reclamation
Act)
- Vegetative cover not dictated by SMCRA
- Little documentation on what is planted
- Reclaimed mine sites represent a relatively unexplored option for GHG
mitigation
- This study assesses the biophysical potential for C sequestration on
reclaimed mine sites
- Analysis considers reclamation to cropland, pasture, and forest
- 20 year time period analyzed
|
3
|
- Analysis part of seven state Regional DOE funded study
- Analyzed land use in IN, KY, MD, MI, OH, PA, and WV
- Overall objective to identify the potential for C sequestration on
cropland, forest, wetland, and mineland to mitigate GHG emissions
- Land Use areas adjusted to avoid overlap of land area for other uses and
mineland
|
4
|
- C sequestration Pools
- Above-ground biomass (forest)
- Forest Litter Layer
- Forest Soils (0 – 30 cm layers)
- Pasture Soil (0 – 30 cm layers)
- Cropland Soil (0 – 30 cm layers)
- Methods
- Literature Derived annual C accumulation rates
- Literature Derived equations from chrono-sequence studies
- IPCC coefficients (cropland and pasture soil C)
- Additional Data Sources
- Surface Permits for coal mines (GIS available for IN, KY, OH, and WV,
tabular data only for MD, MI, and PA)
- 1992 National Land Cover Dataset
- STATSGO
- GIS and Tabular to define mineland area
|
5
|
- Mine Permit Area – 4 States
- Indiana Geological Survey
- Coal Mine Surface shape file –2,615 polygons showing location for
mines dating from late 1880 to 2000
- Kentucky
- Series7_boundaries – 1,195 polygons showing mine permit between 1999 to 2002
- Ohio Department of Natural Resources
- Coal Permit Maps - 2,500 polygons showing location of mines between
1975 to 2002
- West Virginia Department of Envioronmental Protection
- Permit Boundaries – 6,100 polygons showing location of mines between
1972 to 2002
- National Land Cover data by county
|
6
|
- For all land uses, 1992 NLCD primary data source
- Identify NLCD area defined as mineland
- Adjust area to account for difference between GIS data for mineland and
NLCD
- Assume average C accumulation from studies of above-ground biomass and
litter layer for forest
- Average soil C accumulation from published studies and IPCC estimates
|
7
|
|
8
|
|
9
|
|
10
|
|
11
|
- Soil Carbon
- 3 general studies address soil C in forestland
- 3 studies specifically address soil C on reclaimed mine sites
- IPCC method (used to assess cropland, pasture, and forest)
- Forest Litter Layer
- 2 studies address C content of litter layer in forest
- 1 study of litter layer for mineland reclaimed to forest
- Forest Biomass
- 3 studies address forest growth rates and associated C content
- 1 study for mineland reclaimed to forest
- Predominantly USFS studies by state and region
|
12
|
- Considerable variation in C accumulation from published literature
- Used state specific data when possible
- Biomass C accumulation rates for states not addressed by published
study omitted from mineland C estimates
- Range of C sequestration estimated using the maximum and minimum rates
derived from literature
- Average rate of C sequestration from all studies provide base values
- Average C sequestration multiplied by area of mineland
|
13
|
|
14
|
- IPCC Method – Mineland Soil C
- From Different Studies - Mineland Soil C
- Mg C ha-1 = 15 + 29.5/{1 + exp[– (t – 10.8)/2.39]}
- SOC = 0.12 t 0.78 (g 100 g-1 soil)
- C from Forest Biomass (Northeast Oak/Hickory)
|
15
|
|
16
|
|
17
|
|
18
|
|
19
|
|
20
|
|
21
|
- 1990 CO2 emission estimate for 7 state region: 715 Tg CO2 yr-1
- C sequestration potential on mineland reclaimed to forest : 1.5 Tg C yr-1 (5.5 Tg CO2
Eyr-1)
- Mineland C storage < 1% of total 1990 CO2 emissions
- Mineland C storage = 11% of Kyoto emission reduction requirement (7%
below the 1990 level - excluding increase in emissions between 1990 and
2005)
|
22
|
|
23
|
|
24
|
|
25
|
- Reclaiming mineland to forest provides the largest GHG emission off-set
- Mineland reclaimed to forest represents a viable GHG emission mitigation
option
- Reclaimed mine sites may provide least cost option for GHG mitigation
- Landowners already planting some mineland to forest
- Not removing or changing land use
- Potential income stream from C credits
- Incentive for landowners to plant forest
- Motivation for additional research to enhance forest on reclaimed
mineland
- Reclaiming mineland to forest provides ancillary environmental benefits
(wildlife habitat, reduced soil erosion, improved water quality, etc.)
|